Yes, You Can Trademark a Shape – And Gibson Just Proved It (Again)


April 13, 2025

Hello Reader,

Gibson Guitars just won a big victory—and it’s a lesson in brand protection you don’t want to miss.

After years of legal back-and-forth, a federal jury once again ruled in favor of Gibson in its trademark case against Dean Guitars (owned by Armadillo Enterprises). At stake? The rights to iconic guitar body shapes like the Flying V, Explorer, and SG.

Here’s what the jury decided, straight from the court decision:
🎸 Yes – Dean infringed on Gibson’s trademarks and engaged in unfair competition.
🎸 Yes – Dean sold and marketed counterfeit versions of Gibson’s trademarked shapes.
🎸 Yes – The infringement was intentional and willful.
🎸 No – Gibson’s trademarks are not generic. They are valid, enforceable trademarks.

That’s a powerful message: product designs, if distinctive and well-recognized, can be protected as trademarks.

Takeaway Tips from the Gibson Case:

Distinctive product shapes can be just as valuable—and protectable—as logos or names.
Consistency matters – The more recognizable your design becomes over time, the stronger your claim.
Enforce your rights early – Gibson’s delay was challenged in court, but their enforcement still held up because the marks were strong and unique.

Whether you’re building a product, designing packaging, or just getting your brand off the ground, it’s worth asking:
🟡 Is there something about my design that sets me apart visually?
🟡 Am I doing enough to protect it now—before someone else copies it?

If the answer is “I’m not sure,” let’s talk. Trademarks go way beyond words—and this case proves it.

Keep Your Brand Safe and Protected,

J.J. Lee and the Trademark Lawyer Law Firm Team!

P.S. If a guitar body shape can win in court as a trademark, imagine what’s possible with your product’s unique design. Don’t wait until someone else copies it to find out it’s unprotected—let’s make sure your brand assets are legally locked down.

J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney

Learn something new every Thursday! Join over 4,000 entrepreneurs and business owners for weekly Trademark tips, tricks, and news.

Read more from J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney
Two bright cosmic objects are connected in darkness.

June 30, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, In May 2025, the Federal Circuit upheld the USPTO’s refusal to register the mark US SPACE FORCE—but not for the reason most people expect. The issue wasn’t likelihood of confusion. It was something else: false suggestion of a connection. This refusal falls under Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, which bars registration of any mark that falsely suggests a link with: A person (living or dead) An institution A belief or A national symbol In this case, the...

a black and white photo of the supreme court

June 23, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, A recent case before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) highlights a hard truth: you can lose a trademark dispute not because your argument is wrong—but because your paperwork is incomplete. In Superior Brands v. Retrobrands America, Superior tried to cancel a Supplemental Register trademark (KINNEY SHOES) based on a likelihood of confusion with their own intent-to-use application for a similar mark. Their argument? Their application was filed...

Someone is looking at a map of the united states.

June 16, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, Think your trademark is safe because another business with a similar name is far away? Think again. Recent cases confirm that geographical distance no longer guarantees protection from trademark infringement claims. With online commerce bridging physical gaps, consumers can easily be confused—even across great distances. Always do a thorough nationwide trademark search before you settle on a brand name. And remember, federal registration of your...