The #1 Mistake That Can Sink Your Trademark Cancellation Case


June 23, 2025

Hello Reader,

A recent case before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) highlights a hard truth: you can lose a trademark dispute not because your argument is wrong—but because your paperwork is incomplete.

In Superior Brands v. Retrobrands America, Superior tried to cancel a Supplemental Register trademark (KINNEY SHOES) based on a likelihood of confusion with their own intent-to-use application for a similar mark.

Their argument? Their application was filed before the registrant's effective filing date, so they claimed priority.

The problem? They didn’t properly make their own application part of the record.
They attached it to the complaint—but never formally submitted it into evidence during the trial.

As a result, the TTAB ruled:

  • They failed to prove standing (entitlement to bring the case), and
  • They couldn’t prove priority, which is essential in a likelihood of confusion claim.

Game over.

Lessons from the Case:

Follow the TTAB rules—exactly. Attaching something to your complaint isn’t enough. You need to properly introduce it into the record via notice of reliance or testimony.

You can’t win without standing. If you’re trying to cancel someone’s mark, you must prove that you’re directly harmed by it—and you need admissible evidence to back that up.

Priority matters—and must be proven. Even if your application has an earlier date, you need to make sure the TTAB can legally consider it.

Being pro se is risky. The TTAB reminded parties multiple times to consider hiring counsel. Representing yourself means you’re responsible for knowing all procedural rules—and the consequences if you don’t.

The Bottom Line:

Trademark disputes aren’t just about who’s right—they’re about who’s ready. Even strong claims can collapse if you don’t submit the right evidence in the right way.

Keep Your Brand Safe and Protected,

J.J. Lee and the Trademark Lawyer Law Firm Team!

P.S. If you’re thinking about filing a cancellation or opposition—or defending one—don’t go it alone. Let’s make sure your case is airtight from the start.

J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney

Learn something new every Thursday! Join over 4,000 entrepreneurs and business owners for weekly Trademark tips, tricks, and news.

Read more from J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney

August 11, 2025 Hello Reader, It’s tempting to think that if you’ve designed something innovative—something instantly recognizable in the market—you should be able to trademark it. But in trademark law, there’s a critical rule you can’t ignore: If your design is functional, it can’t be registered as a trademark. A recent decision from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) involving the Shibumi Shade beach canopy illustrates this point clearly. Shibumi Shade applied to register the 3D...

a red wrong way sign on a pole

August 4, 2025 Hello Reader, Most people assume that when the USPTO refuses a trademark application, that’s the end of the road. But every so often, a case comes along that reminds us: the USPTO isn’t always right, and their decisions can be overturned. A recent example? The trademark ENAIRA, which the USPTO tried to block under Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act for supposedly suggesting a false connection with the Central Bank of Nigeria. Despite a messy and prolonged prosecution...

The image shows a busy, colorful clothing store.

July 28, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, If your trademark application has ever been blocked by a strange, unfamiliar registration—one with a made-up name or suspicious “proof of use”—you may have run into a growing problem in the trademark world: specimen farms. The USPTO recently issued a public warning about these setups, and it’s something every business owner and brand builder should understand. Because if you’re doing things right—actually using your brand in commerce and building your...