The #1 Mistake That Can Sink Your Trademark Cancellation Case


June 23, 2025

Hello Reader,

A recent case before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) highlights a hard truth: you can lose a trademark dispute not because your argument is wrong—but because your paperwork is incomplete.

In Superior Brands v. Retrobrands America, Superior tried to cancel a Supplemental Register trademark (KINNEY SHOES) based on a likelihood of confusion with their own intent-to-use application for a similar mark.

Their argument? Their application was filed before the registrant's effective filing date, so they claimed priority.

The problem? They didn’t properly make their own application part of the record.
They attached it to the complaint—but never formally submitted it into evidence during the trial.

As a result, the TTAB ruled:

  • They failed to prove standing (entitlement to bring the case), and
  • They couldn’t prove priority, which is essential in a likelihood of confusion claim.

Game over.

Lessons from the Case:

Follow the TTAB rules—exactly. Attaching something to your complaint isn’t enough. You need to properly introduce it into the record via notice of reliance or testimony.

You can’t win without standing. If you’re trying to cancel someone’s mark, you must prove that you’re directly harmed by it—and you need admissible evidence to back that up.

Priority matters—and must be proven. Even if your application has an earlier date, you need to make sure the TTAB can legally consider it.

Being pro se is risky. The TTAB reminded parties multiple times to consider hiring counsel. Representing yourself means you’re responsible for knowing all procedural rules—and the consequences if you don’t.

The Bottom Line:

Trademark disputes aren’t just about who’s right—they’re about who’s ready. Even strong claims can collapse if you don’t submit the right evidence in the right way.

Keep Your Brand Safe and Protected,

J.J. Lee and the Trademark Lawyer Law Firm Team!

P.S. If you’re thinking about filing a cancellation or opposition—or defending one—don’t go it alone. Let’s make sure your case is airtight from the start.

J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney

Learn something new every Thursday! Join over 4,000 entrepreneurs and business owners for weekly Trademark tips, tricks, and news.

Read more from J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney
Brick building entrance framed by lush greenery.

July 14, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, Most people know that trademarks protect your brand name, but did you know that famous trademarks get a higher level of protection under the law? Two recent cases show exactly how that works—and how powerful a famous trademark can be in court. Case #1: The IVY LEAGUE Stops “IV League Nurse Concierge” The Ivy League colleges (like Harvard and Yale) collectively own the trademark THE IVY LEAGUE, and they've used it for decades in connection with education,...

Applying lip gloss to lips.

July 7, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, You might think leather purses and cosmetics have nothing to do with each other. But when the same trademark is used for both, the USPTO says: there’s a real chance of confusion. That’s exactly what happened in a recent case where Huella Studio LLC tried to register the mark HUELLA (which means “fingerprint” in Spanish) for high-end leather goods. But the mark was already registered by someone else—for cosmetics and nail products. Even though the products...

Two bright cosmic objects are connected in darkness.

June 30, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, In May 2025, the Federal Circuit upheld the USPTO’s refusal to register the mark US SPACE FORCE—but not for the reason most people expect. The issue wasn’t likelihood of confusion. It was something else: false suggestion of a connection. This refusal falls under Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, which bars registration of any mark that falsely suggests a link with: A person (living or dead) An institution A belief or A national symbol In this case, the...