Why You Can’t Trademark “US SPACE FORCE”—And What That Means for You


June 30, 2025

Hello Reader,

In May 2025, the Federal Circuit upheld the USPTO’s refusal to register the mark US SPACE FORCE—but not for the reason most people expect.

The issue wasn’t likelihood of confusion. It was something else: false suggestion of a connection.
This refusal falls under Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, which bars registration of any mark that falsely suggests a link with:

  • A person (living or dead)
  • An institution
  • A belief or
  • A national symbol

In this case, the court found that “US SPACE FORCE” falsely suggests a connection with the United States Government, and particularly with the newly formed sixth branch of the military.

Here’s what happened:

🔹 The applicant filed for the trademark just days after President Trump publicly announced the creation of the U.S. Space Force.

🔹 The Board found that the phrase “US SPACE FORCE” already pointed unmistakably to the federal government—even before the branch was officially formed.

🔹 The court emphasized that intent doesn’t matter—even if the applicant wasn’t deliberately trying to mislead, the public would still believe the name implied a government connection.

What This Means for You:

Don’t try to trademark government phrases, departments, or programs — Even if they seem clever, they likely violate Section 2(a).

Names that sound official can trigger refusals — If your proposed mark resembles something associated with a well-known institution, you may be seen as exploiting that association.

False connection ≠ consumer confusion — This type of refusal is about protecting the identity of institutions themselves, not just the buying public.

Timing doesn’t always help — Even though the trademark was filed early, the court held that the USPTO could still evaluate events that happened after the filing date—but before the final Board decision.

The Bottom Line:
A great trademark creates a strong identity—but if it borrows too closely from an existing one, especially a government entity, it could be rejected as a false connection.

Need help deciding if your brand name is distinctive—and registrable?

Let’s talk.

Keep Your Brand Safe and Protected,

J.J. Lee and the Trademark Lawyer Law Firm Team!

P.S. If your mark sounds like it belongs to a school, government office, celebrity, or public institution—you might be in 2(a) territory. Let’s review it together before the USPTO calls it out.

J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney

Learn something new every Thursday! Join over 4,000 entrepreneurs and business owners for weekly Trademark tips, tricks, and news.

Read more from J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney
The image shows a busy, colorful clothing store.

July 28, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, If your trademark application has ever been blocked by a strange, unfamiliar registration—one with a made-up name or suspicious “proof of use”—you may have run into a growing problem in the trademark world: specimen farms. The USPTO recently issued a public warning about these setups, and it’s something every business owner and brand builder should understand. Because if you’re doing things right—actually using your brand in commerce and building your...

The coca-cola store glows brightly at dusk.

July 21, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, You might not think of trademarks as a business growth tool, but companies like Target sure do. In fiscal year 2024, Target filed more trademark applications than any other company in the U.S.—a total of 525, according to the Star Tribune (read the article here). That’s not a typo. And it wasn’t about chasing trends—it was about protecting their 40+ private-label brands, including heavy-hitters like Cat & Jack (kidswear), Good & Gather (groceries), and...

Brick building entrance framed by lush greenery.

July 14, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, Most people know that trademarks protect your brand name, but did you know that famous trademarks get a higher level of protection under the law? Two recent cases show exactly how that works—and how powerful a famous trademark can be in court. Case #1: The IVY LEAGUE Stops “IV League Nurse Concierge” The Ivy League colleges (like Harvard and Yale) collectively own the trademark THE IVY LEAGUE, and they've used it for decades in connection with education,...