When “Eco” Isn’t Enough – A Lesson from the ECOTWEED Case


April 28, 2025

Hello Reader,

Most brand owners know they can’t use misleading trademarks. But did you know a trademark can be refused just for sounding misleading—even if it’s technically true?

That’s exactly what happened in the recent case of In re Twisted X, Inc., where the USPTO refused to register the mark ECOTWEED for “footwear made of a tweed-like material.”

What’s the issue?

The Trademark Office said the mark ECOTWEED was deceptive under Section 2(a) of the Trademark Act. Why? Because:

  1. “Tweed” usually means a wool-based fabric, and the applicant admitted their product was made from recycled plastic bottles, not wool.
  2. Consumers have seen “tweed” used to describe real fabric—so they might believe these shoes were made of wool.
  3. Tweed is known for being durable, warm, and weather-resistant—qualities that could influence a buyer’s decision.

The Board concluded that even though the goods were accurately described as made of “tweed-like material,” the ECOTWEED name would likely lead people to believe they were buying real tweed.

But wait—what about the “eco”?

The applicant argued that the “eco” prefix changes the meaning of the mark and signals to consumers that it’s something different. But the Board didn’t buy it. They said there was no strong evidence that “eco” signals “imitation” to the average consumer.

One judge dissented, saying the majority was being too rigid and that consumers would understand the difference between real tweed and tweed-like material. But the majority stuck to their view: reasonable consumers could still be misled.

Tips & Tricks: How to Avoid a Deceptive Refusal

Be cautious with coined terms – Just because you made it up doesn’t mean consumers won’t read into it.

Know your materials – If your mark includes a term like “wool,” “leather,” “gold,” or “tweed,” and your product doesn’t contain it—you might be at risk.

“Eco” doesn’t fix everything – Adding “eco,” “bio,” or “green” doesn’t automatically make a name safe. You still need to think about how consumers will interpret the full mark.

Tell the truth in marketing—but also in naming – Even if your packaging or website clearly explains what the product is, your trademark still has to stand on its own.

Trademark law protects consumers from being misled—and trademarks that suggest your product is something it’s not can get rejected. If you’re building a brand around sustainable materials, innovation, or design, let’s make sure your name is just as smart as your product.

Keep Your Brand Safe and Protected,

J.J. Lee and the Trademark Lawyer Law Firm Team!

P.S. If you’re using terms like “eco,” “plant-based,” or “vegan” in your brand name, it’s worth a quick check to make sure your trademark won’t get flagged as deceptive. Let me know if you’d like to talk it through.

J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney

Learn something new every Thursday! Join over 4,000 entrepreneurs and business owners for weekly Trademark tips, tricks, and news.

Read more from J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney
A cheese knife rests on a wooden table.

May 19, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, Here’s a recent reminder from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB): sometimes, the name you pick for your product is just too on the nose to protect. That was the case in In re Jacobs Corporation, where the company tried to register the word BLADE as a trademark for a “hammer sold as an integral component of hammer mill machines.” The USPTO said no—and the TTAB backed them up. Why? Let’s break it down: 🔍 Jacobs argued: Their product is a hammer,...

Cannabis plant growing inside a greenhouse.

May 12, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, The USPTO rolled out a new trademark fee structure in January 2025. On the surface, it looks like a simple pricing adjustment—but if you work with hemp or CBD products, the reality is much more costly. Here’s what changed: 🚨 New Trademark Fee Structure (Effective Jan. 18, 2025): Base Application Fee: $350 per class Custom Descriptions: +$200 per class if you don’t use pre-approved ID Manual language Extra Length Fee: +$200 per 1,000 characters over the...

Here is a close-up photo of a chicken.

May 5, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit reminded everyone that even if your product seems far removed from a restaurant, a similar name could still cause trademark problems. The case? A brewery tried to register the mark CHICKEN SCRATCH for beer. But they were blocked by a restaurant that already had a trademark registration for the same name—CHICKEN SCRATCH—for restaurant services. The Trademark Office refused registration, and the Federal Circuit...