When “Eco” Isn’t Enough – A Lesson from the ECOTWEED Case


April 28, 2025

Hello Reader,

Most brand owners know they can’t use misleading trademarks. But did you know a trademark can be refused just for sounding misleading—even if it’s technically true?

That’s exactly what happened in the recent case of In re Twisted X, Inc., where the USPTO refused to register the mark ECOTWEED for “footwear made of a tweed-like material.”

What’s the issue?

The Trademark Office said the mark ECOTWEED was deceptive under Section 2(a) of the Trademark Act. Why? Because:

  1. “Tweed” usually means a wool-based fabric, and the applicant admitted their product was made from recycled plastic bottles, not wool.
  2. Consumers have seen “tweed” used to describe real fabric—so they might believe these shoes were made of wool.
  3. Tweed is known for being durable, warm, and weather-resistant—qualities that could influence a buyer’s decision.

The Board concluded that even though the goods were accurately described as made of “tweed-like material,” the ECOTWEED name would likely lead people to believe they were buying real tweed.

But wait—what about the “eco”?

The applicant argued that the “eco” prefix changes the meaning of the mark and signals to consumers that it’s something different. But the Board didn’t buy it. They said there was no strong evidence that “eco” signals “imitation” to the average consumer.

One judge dissented, saying the majority was being too rigid and that consumers would understand the difference between real tweed and tweed-like material. But the majority stuck to their view: reasonable consumers could still be misled.

Tips & Tricks: How to Avoid a Deceptive Refusal

Be cautious with coined terms – Just because you made it up doesn’t mean consumers won’t read into it.

Know your materials – If your mark includes a term like “wool,” “leather,” “gold,” or “tweed,” and your product doesn’t contain it—you might be at risk.

“Eco” doesn’t fix everything – Adding “eco,” “bio,” or “green” doesn’t automatically make a name safe. You still need to think about how consumers will interpret the full mark.

Tell the truth in marketing—but also in naming – Even if your packaging or website clearly explains what the product is, your trademark still has to stand on its own.

Trademark law protects consumers from being misled—and trademarks that suggest your product is something it’s not can get rejected. If you’re building a brand around sustainable materials, innovation, or design, let’s make sure your name is just as smart as your product.

Keep Your Brand Safe and Protected,

J.J. Lee and the Trademark Lawyer Law Firm Team!

P.S. If you’re using terms like “eco,” “plant-based,” or “vegan” in your brand name, it’s worth a quick check to make sure your trademark won’t get flagged as deceptive. Let me know if you’d like to talk it through.

J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney

Learn something new every Thursday! Join over 4,000 entrepreneurs and business owners for weekly Trademark tips, tricks, and news.

Read more from J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney
Person reading a book, captured in black and white.

April 21, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, Here’s another real-world lesson from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) that highlights two common pitfalls brand owners face: 🔁 Choosing a name that’s too close to an existing mark🔁 Using a last name without understanding the trademark limits The case involved Wyse London, a fashion brand that applied to register its name for clothing and retail store services. But the USPTO refused registration on two separate grounds—and the TTAB agreed....

Guitars sit in a rack, awaiting performance.

April 13, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, Gibson Guitars just won a big victory—and it’s a lesson in brand protection you don’t want to miss. After years of legal back-and-forth, a federal jury once again ruled in favor of Gibson in its trademark case against Dean Guitars (owned by Armadillo Enterprises). At stake? The rights to iconic guitar body shapes like the Flying V, Explorer, and SG. Here’s what the jury decided, straight from the court decision: 🎸 Yes – Dean infringed on Gibson’s...

Mush Overnight Oats

April 7, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, You may have seen MUSH—the oat-based breakfast cups—on Costco shelves. My wife picked some up recently, and I thought it was a solid product. So I was surprised to learn the company behind it just lost their trademark battle at the USPTO. Mush Mush Foods, Inc. tried to register MUSH as a trademark for “ready-to-eat cereals” made with oats. But the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) ruled that “mush” is generic—meaning it's a common term for a type...