Why “SWIPE LEFT” Was Rejected — and How to Avoid the Same Mistake


June 9, 2025

Can you trademark a phrase everyone uses?

Hello Reader,

In a recent decision, the USPTO rejected Tinder’s applications to register “SWIPE LEFT” for its dating app and services. Why? Because “SWIPE LEFT” was found to be:

Merely descriptive — It directly describes what users do in the app to reject a match.
Fails to function as a trademark — It’s a common phrase that conveys a familiar idea: rejection.

Tinder submitted two consumer surveys trying to show people associate the phrase with their brand. But the surveys didn’t prove that the phrase actually functions as a source identifier—the key requirement for any trademark. The Board noted the surveys tested “association,” not whether the public saw the phrase as a brand, and association alone isn’t enough.

Even if you coined the phrase (as Tinder claimed they did), if it becomes common slang—or if it just describes how your product works—it's probably not protectable.

Tip: Before applying, ask:

  • Does this phrase describe how my product works?
  • Would others reasonably want to use this phrase too?
  • Do people already use it as a common saying?

If the answer is “yes” to any of those, you may need a more distinctive mark—or at least file on the Supplemental Register if eligible.

Bottom line: Descriptive or widely used phrases like “SWIPE LEFT” may make for great branding... but not great trademarks.

Want to avoid costly refusals? We can help evaluate your mark before you file.

Keep Your Brand Safe and Protected,

J.J. Lee and the Trademark Lawyer Law Firm Team!

P.S. This isn’t just a Tinder problem. The same refusal can hit businesses using any popular or descriptive phrase—whether you're selling software, shirts, or supplements. Better to find out now than after the USPTO says “no.”

J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney

Learn something new every Thursday! Join over 4,000 entrepreneurs and business owners for weekly Trademark tips, tricks, and news.

Read more from J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney

August 11, 2025 Hello Reader, It’s tempting to think that if you’ve designed something innovative—something instantly recognizable in the market—you should be able to trademark it. But in trademark law, there’s a critical rule you can’t ignore: If your design is functional, it can’t be registered as a trademark. A recent decision from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) involving the Shibumi Shade beach canopy illustrates this point clearly. Shibumi Shade applied to register the 3D...

a red wrong way sign on a pole

August 4, 2025 Hello Reader, Most people assume that when the USPTO refuses a trademark application, that’s the end of the road. But every so often, a case comes along that reminds us: the USPTO isn’t always right, and their decisions can be overturned. A recent example? The trademark ENAIRA, which the USPTO tried to block under Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act for supposedly suggesting a false connection with the Central Bank of Nigeria. Despite a messy and prolonged prosecution...

The image shows a busy, colorful clothing store.

July 28, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, If your trademark application has ever been blocked by a strange, unfamiliar registration—one with a made-up name or suspicious “proof of use”—you may have run into a growing problem in the trademark world: specimen farms. The USPTO recently issued a public warning about these setups, and it’s something every business owner and brand builder should understand. Because if you’re doing things right—actually using your brand in commerce and building your...