profile

J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney

Why “SWIPE LEFT” Was Rejected — and How to Avoid the Same Mistake

Published 4 days ago • 1 min read

​

June 9, 2025

Can you trademark a phrase everyone uses?

Hello Reader,

In a recent decision, the USPTO rejected Tinder’s applications to register “SWIPE LEFT” for its dating app and services. Why? Because “SWIPE LEFT” was found to be:

✅ Merely descriptive — It directly describes what users do in the app to reject a match.
✅ Fails to function as a trademark — It’s a common phrase that conveys a familiar idea: rejection.

Tinder submitted two consumer surveys trying to show people associate the phrase with their brand. But the surveys didn’t prove that the phrase actually functions as a source identifier—the key requirement for any trademark. The Board noted the surveys tested “association,” not whether the public saw the phrase as a brand, and association alone isn’t enough.

Even if you coined the phrase (as Tinder claimed they did), if it becomes common slang—or if it just describes how your product works—it's probably not protectable.

Tip: Before applying, ask:

  • Does this phrase describe how my product works?
  • Would others reasonably want to use this phrase too?
  • Do people already use it as a common saying?

If the answer is “yes” to any of those, you may need a more distinctive mark—or at least file on the Supplemental Register if eligible.

Bottom line: Descriptive or widely used phrases like “SWIPE LEFT” may make for great branding... but not great trademarks.

Want to avoid costly refusals? We can help evaluate your mark before you file.

Keep Your Brand Safe and Protected,​
​

J.J. Lee and the Trademark Lawyer Law Firm Team!

P.S. This isn’t just a Tinder problem. The same refusal can hit businesses using any popular or descriptive phrase—whether you're selling software, shirts, or supplements. Better to find out now than after the USPTO says “no.”

​

J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney

Protecting your Brand and Trademark Since 2007 and over 7,000 Trademark Registrations.

Learn something new every Thursday! Join over 4,000 entrepreneurs and business owners for weekly Trademark tips, tricks, and news.

Read more from J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney

June 2, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, When you apply for a trademark, one of the things the USPTO checks is whether your drawing matches how you actually use the mark. If it doesn’t—especially if you’ve carved out just a piece of the full brand name—you might get hit with a refusal for “mutilation.” Yes, that’s a real trademark term. And it just tripped up a pharmaceutical company. In In re Verrica Pharmaceuticals Inc., the company applied to register a stylized "V" with three dots above it,...

11 days ago • 1 min read

June 2, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, Color trademarks can be powerful brand assets—but they’re not easy to register. A recent case involving dark green medical gloves shows just how high the bar is. Green Gloves In In re PT Medisafe Technologies, the company tried to register the color Pantone 3285 C (dark green) for chloroprene medical examination gloves. They claimed it functioned as a trademark for their brand. The USPTO refused registration, and the Federal Circuit agreed, calling the...

11 days ago • 1 min read
A cheese knife rests on a wooden table.

May 19, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, Here’s a recent reminder from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB): sometimes, the name you pick for your product is just too on the nose to protect. That was the case in In re Jacobs Corporation, where the company tried to register the word BLADE as a trademark for a “hammer sold as an integral component of hammer mill machines.” The USPTO said no—and the TTAB backed them up. Why? Let’s break it down: 🔍 Jacobs argued: Their product is a hammer,...

25 days ago • 1 min read