When a Stylized Letter Isn’t Enough – What Trademark “Mutilation” Really Means


June 2, 2025

Hello Reader,

When you apply for a trademark, one of the things the USPTO checks is whether your drawing matches how you actually use the mark. If it doesn’t—especially if you’ve carved out just a piece of the full brand name—you might get hit with a refusal for “mutilation.”

Yes, that’s a real trademark term. And it just tripped up a pharmaceutical company.

In In re Verrica Pharmaceuticals Inc., the company applied to register a stylized "V" with three dots above it, claiming it as a standalone trademark. But on their packaging and website, that “V” was part of the word VERRICA.

The USPTO refused the registration. The TTAB agreed.

Why?

Because the stylized “V” was not separate enough from the rest of the word.
🔸 There wasn’t enough spacing between the V and the letters “ERRICA”
🔸 The V didn’t appear by itself anywhere on the packaging or website
🔸 Even though the V was stylized and colored differently, it still functioned as the first letter of the full brand name

The Board explained: “Consumers will immediately understand the word to be ‘VERRICA’ with a stylized V as the first letter. Only looking at the V would require that we cast a blind eye on the rest of the word.”

That’s what trademark law calls mutilation—trying to register only part of a mark that isn’t perceived by the public as standing on its own.

Key Takeaways:

Consistency is critical – If you want to register a single element (like a letter or design), you must actually use it that way—as a standalone source indicator.

Spacing matters – If the element is part of a wordmark, it must be visually and conceptually distinct from the rest.

Style ≠ separability – Just because something looks different doesn’t mean it functions separately in the eyes of consumers.

Use what you file – Your drawing must be a “substantially exact” match of the mark as shown in your specimens.

The Bottom Line

If you’re trying to carve out a stylized element of your logo or wordmark for separate protection, be strategic—and make sure it’s being used that way in real life. Otherwise, you may end up with a rejection, and a wasted filing.

Keep Your Brand Safe and Protected,

J.J. Lee and the Trademark Lawyer Law Firm Team!

P.S. If you’ve ever wondered whether a stylized letter, icon, or part of your logo is registrable on its own, let’s take a closer look—before the USPTO tells you it’s been “mutilated.”

J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney

Learn something new every Thursday! Join over 4,000 entrepreneurs and business owners for weekly Trademark tips, tricks, and news.

Read more from J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney
a black and white photo of the supreme court

June 23, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, A recent case before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) highlights a hard truth: you can lose a trademark dispute not because your argument is wrong—but because your paperwork is incomplete. In Superior Brands v. Retrobrands America, Superior tried to cancel a Supplemental Register trademark (KINNEY SHOES) based on a likelihood of confusion with their own intent-to-use application for a similar mark. Their argument? Their application was filed...

Someone is looking at a map of the united states.

June 16, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, Think your trademark is safe because another business with a similar name is far away? Think again. Recent cases confirm that geographical distance no longer guarantees protection from trademark infringement claims. With online commerce bridging physical gaps, consumers can easily be confused—even across great distances. Always do a thorough nationwide trademark search before you settle on a brand name. And remember, federal registration of your...

a woman sitting on a bench holding a cell phone

June 9, 2025 TMtelegram Can you trademark a phrase everyone uses? Hello Reader, In a recent decision, the USPTO rejected Tinder’s applications to register “SWIPE LEFT” for its dating app and services. Why? Because “SWIPE LEFT” was found to be: ✅ Merely descriptive — It directly describes what users do in the app to reject a match.✅ Fails to function as a trademark — It’s a common phrase that conveys a familiar idea: rejection. Tinder submitted two consumer surveys trying to show people...