Warning: USPTO Cracking Down on Fake Trademark Filings


March 10, 2025

Hello Reader,

I want to share an important warning about trademark mass filing companies and why using them could put your trademark at risk. The U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) recently announced that they may cancel more than 40,000 trademarks because they were filed using fake or misleading information.

Here’s what’s happening:

  • Some companies pretend to be real trademark attorneys when they’re not.
  • They use fake names, fake signatures, and false information to file trademarks.
  • The USPTO discovered this fraud and is now canceling these trademarks.

If you used one of these companies, your trademark could be at risk, even if it was already approved. You can read more about it in this article:
USPTO Show Cause Order – 40,000 Trademarks at Risk

How to Protect Your Trademark:

Work with a real trademark attorney – Someone licensed and experienced.
Be careful with companies promising fast and cheap trademark filings – If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.
Check who is filing your trademark – Make sure it’s a trusted professional.

Losing a trademark can be costly and frustrating. If you have any concerns about your trademark or need help securing your brand the right way, feel free to reach out.

Keep Your Brand Safe and Protected,

J.J. Lee and the Trademark Lawyer Law Firm Team!

P.S. Even if your trademark was filed correctly, it’s a good idea to double-check its status. The USPTO is getting stricter, and you don’t want any surprises down the road. Let me know if you’d like me to take a look!

J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney

Learn something new every Thursday! Join over 4,000 entrepreneurs and business owners for weekly Trademark tips, tricks, and news.

Read more from J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney
Two bright cosmic objects are connected in darkness.

June 30, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, In May 2025, the Federal Circuit upheld the USPTO’s refusal to register the mark US SPACE FORCE—but not for the reason most people expect. The issue wasn’t likelihood of confusion. It was something else: false suggestion of a connection. This refusal falls under Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, which bars registration of any mark that falsely suggests a link with: A person (living or dead) An institution A belief or A national symbol In this case, the...

a black and white photo of the supreme court

June 23, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, A recent case before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) highlights a hard truth: you can lose a trademark dispute not because your argument is wrong—but because your paperwork is incomplete. In Superior Brands v. Retrobrands America, Superior tried to cancel a Supplemental Register trademark (KINNEY SHOES) based on a likelihood of confusion with their own intent-to-use application for a similar mark. Their argument? Their application was filed...

Someone is looking at a map of the united states.

June 16, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, Think your trademark is safe because another business with a similar name is far away? Think again. Recent cases confirm that geographical distance no longer guarantees protection from trademark infringement claims. With online commerce bridging physical gaps, consumers can easily be confused—even across great distances. Always do a thorough nationwide trademark search before you settle on a brand name. And remember, federal registration of your...