Trademark Tip: Don’t Get Too “Wyse” with Your Brand Name


April 21, 2025

Hello Reader,

Here’s another real-world lesson from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) that highlights two common pitfalls brand owners face:

🔁 Choosing a name that’s too close to an existing mark
🔁 Using a last name without understanding the trademark limits

The case involved Wyse London, a fashion brand that applied to register its name for clothing and retail store services. But the USPTO refused registration on two separate grounds—and the TTAB agreed.

Here’s What Went Wrong:

1. Likelihood of Confusion (Section 2(d))
The TTAB found that WYSE LONDON was too similar to an existing registration for WYSE (in stylized form), which covered clothing accessories like buttons, zippers, and hat ornaments. Even though the goods weren’t identical, the Board held that:
✔ The marks are “highly similar”
✔ The goods are related and often sold under the same brand
✔ Consumers could easily assume both come from the same source

Pro tip: Just because products are in different classes doesn’t mean they’re safe from conflict. Zippers and hats? Still too close.

2. Surname Refusal (Section 2(e)(4))
Because the company’s founder is Marielle Wyse, and the brand openly promotes this, the TTAB held that WYSE is primarily merely a surname—which can’t be registered on the Principal Register without proving acquired distinctiveness.

Adding “LONDON” didn’t help. The Board noted that it just made it sound like “a brand run by someone named Wyse in London”—which was literally true and didn’t change the surname analysis.

Tips & Tricks to Avoid These Issues:

Search first, build later – Don’t invest in packaging, branding, or a product launch until you know your name clears key legal hurdles.
Surnames are tricky – If your name is on the door, you may need to prove that consumers recognize it as a brand—not just a family name.
Consider creative add-ons – Adding unique, suggestive, or fanciful elements to a surname can improve your chances of approval.

Naming a brand is hard enough—don’t let a simple refusal set you back months (or years). If you're not sure whether your brand name is safe, a quick strategy session could save you thousands.

Keep Your Brand Safe and Protected,

J.J. Lee and the Trademark Lawyer Law Firm Team!

P.S. If you’re planning to use your last name in your brand or launch a line of clothing or accessories, let’s check for conflicts first. The TTAB isn’t too forgiving when it comes to surnames or sound-alike marks.

J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney

Learn something new every Thursday! Join over 4,000 entrepreneurs and business owners for weekly Trademark tips, tricks, and news.

Read more from J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney
Cannabis plant growing inside a greenhouse.

May 12, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, The USPTO rolled out a new trademark fee structure in January 2025. On the surface, it looks like a simple pricing adjustment—but if you work with hemp or CBD products, the reality is much more costly. Here’s what changed: 🚨 New Trademark Fee Structure (Effective Jan. 18, 2025): Base Application Fee: $350 per class Custom Descriptions: +$200 per class if you don’t use pre-approved ID Manual language Extra Length Fee: +$200 per 1,000 characters over the...

Here is a close-up photo of a chicken.

May 5, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit reminded everyone that even if your product seems far removed from a restaurant, a similar name could still cause trademark problems. The case? A brewery tried to register the mark CHICKEN SCRATCH for beer. But they were blocked by a restaurant that already had a trademark registration for the same name—CHICKEN SCRATCH—for restaurant services. The Trademark Office refused registration, and the Federal Circuit...

Ground texture featuring dirt, grass, and debris.

April 28, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, Most brand owners know they can’t use misleading trademarks. But did you know a trademark can be refused just for sounding misleading—even if it’s technically true? That’s exactly what happened in the recent case of In re Twisted X, Inc., where the USPTO refused to register the mark ECOTWEED for “footwear made of a tweed-like material.” What’s the issue? The Trademark Office said the mark ECOTWEED was deceptive under Section 2(a) of the Trademark Act....