Protect Your Brand: How UDRP Can Help You Reclaim Stolen Domains

Published about 1 month ago • 1 min read

March 17, 2025

Hello Reader,

If you own a registered trademark, you’ve already taken a big step in protecting your brand. But what happens if someone else registers a domain name that’s confusingly similar to your trademark? They might be using it to mislead customers, sell competing products, or hold it for ransom.

This is where UDRP (Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy) comes in. It’s a powerful tool that lets trademark owners reclaim domain names from bad actors—without needing a costly lawsuit.

How UDRP Works

If someone has registered a domain that violates your trademark rights, you can file a UDRP complaint to challenge their ownership. To win, you must show:
✅ The domain is confusingly similar to your registered trademark.
✅ The other party has no legitimate rights to use it.
✅ The domain was registered and is being used in bad faith (e.g., to profit off your brand or mislead customers).

If you succeed, the domain can be transferred to you—protecting your brand and keeping customers from getting confused.

When Should You Use UDRP?

✔ Someone is using a domain similar to your trademark to mislead customers.
✔ A competitor is trying to profit from your brand’s reputation.
✔ A domain squatter is holding your trademarked name hostage, demanding a high price.

UDRP can be a fast and effective way to reclaim domains without the long delays and costs of a lawsuit. If you’ve spotted an issue with a domain that should belong to your brand, I can help you take action. Let’s make sure your trademark is fully protected.

Contact Us TODAY!

Keep Your Brand Safe and Protected,

J.J. Lee and the Trademark Lawyer Law Firm Team!

P.S. If someone is using a domain that confuses your customers or damages your brand, don’t wait! UDRP cases move fast—let’s discuss your options today.

trademarklawyerfirm.com
Unsubscribe · Preferences

Read more from J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney

Person reading a book, captured in black and white.

Trademark Tip: Don’t Get Too “Wyse” with Your Brand Name

April 21, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, Here’s another real-world lesson from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) that highlights two common pitfalls brand owners face: 🔁 Choosing a name that’s too close to an existing mark🔁 Using a last name without understanding the trademark limits The case involved Wyse London, a fashion brand that applied to register its name for clothing and retail store services. But the USPTO refused registration on two separate grounds—and the TTAB agreed....

3 days ago • 1 min read

Guitars sit in a rack, awaiting performance.

Yes, You Can Trademark a Shape – And Gibson Just Proved It (Again)

April 13, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, Gibson Guitars just won a big victory—and it’s a lesson in brand protection you don’t want to miss. After years of legal back-and-forth, a federal jury once again ruled in favor of Gibson in its trademark case against Dean Guitars (owned by Armadillo Enterprises). At stake? The rights to iconic guitar body shapes like the Flying V, Explorer, and SG. Here’s what the jury decided, straight from the court decision: 🎸 Yes – Dean infringed on Gibson’s...

10 days ago • 1 min read

A Harsh Lesson in Brand Protection: Why “MUSH” Was Rejected by the USPTO

April 7, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, You may have seen MUSH—the oat-based breakfast cups—on Costco shelves. My wife picked some up recently, and I thought it was a solid product. So I was surprised to learn the company behind it just lost their trademark battle at the USPTO. Mush Mush Foods, Inc. tried to register MUSH as a trademark for “ready-to-eat cereals” made with oats. But the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) ruled that “mush” is generic—meaning it's a common term for a type...

17 days ago • 1 min read