Don’t Get Cut—Why BLADE Was Too Descriptive for Trademark Protection


May 19, 2025

Hello Reader,

Here’s a recent reminder from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB): sometimes, the name you pick for your product is just too on the nose to protect.

That was the case in In re Jacobs Corporation, where the company tried to register the word BLADE as a trademark for a “hammer sold as an integral component of hammer mill machines.”

The USPTO said no—and the TTAB backed them up.

Why? Let’s break it down:

🔍 Jacobs argued:

  • Their product is a hammer, not a blade—it crushes, it doesn’t cut.
  • The term "blade" describes something entirely different.
  • Even the Examining Attorney called it “potentially descriptive”, not definitively so.

📎 The USPTO presented:

  • Patents, articles, and advertisements all referring to “hammer blades” as components used in hammer mill machines.
  • Jacobs’s own specimen (product image) resembled those commonly marketed as “blades.”

TTAB’s Ruling:

The word BLADE is “merely descriptive” because:
✅ It immediately conveys information about a form or feature of the product.
✅ Industry usage includes references to “hammer blades.”
✅ Descriptive words like this can’t function as trademarks unless they’ve acquired distinctiveness—and Jacobs hadn’t shown that.

They also denied Jacobs’s last-minute attempt to amend the application to the Supplemental Register because the proper request to suspend and remand the case wasn’t filed.

Trademark Tips from the BLADE Case:

🔹 Avoid generic or descriptive words unless you have a compelling reason—and can prove secondary meaning.
🔹 What the industry calls it matters—not just what you personally think it means.
🔹 Don’t wait until appeal to pivot—If you want to amend to the Supplemental Register, you have to follow the right process early.

The Bottom Line

If customers or competitors would instantly understand what your product is just from the name alone, it’s probably descriptive—and that’s a problem for registration.

Keep Your Brand Safe and Protected,

J.J. Lee and the Trademark Lawyer Law Firm Team!

P.S. Descriptive trademarks are one of the most common reasons USPTO applications get rejected. If you're in the early stages of naming a product, let’s review your options now—before the USPTO cuts your mark down.

J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney

Learn something new every Thursday! Join over 4,000 entrepreneurs and business owners for weekly Trademark tips, tricks, and news.

Read more from J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney
a woman sitting on a bench holding a cell phone

June 9, 2025 TMtelegram Can you trademark a phrase everyone uses? Hello Reader, In a recent decision, the USPTO rejected Tinder’s applications to register “SWIPE LEFT” for its dating app and services. Why? Because “SWIPE LEFT” was found to be: ✅ Merely descriptive — It directly describes what users do in the app to reject a match.✅ Fails to function as a trademark — It’s a common phrase that conveys a familiar idea: rejection. Tinder submitted two consumer surveys trying to show people...

June 2, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, When you apply for a trademark, one of the things the USPTO checks is whether your drawing matches how you actually use the mark. If it doesn’t—especially if you’ve carved out just a piece of the full brand name—you might get hit with a refusal for “mutilation.” Yes, that’s a real trademark term. And it just tripped up a pharmaceutical company. In In re Verrica Pharmaceuticals Inc., the company applied to register a stylized "V" with three dots above it,...

June 2, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, Color trademarks can be powerful brand assets—but they’re not easy to register. A recent case involving dark green medical gloves shows just how high the bar is. Green Gloves In In re PT Medisafe Technologies, the company tried to register the color Pantone 3285 C (dark green) for chloroprene medical examination gloves. They claimed it functioned as a trademark for their brand. The USPTO refused registration, and the Federal Circuit agreed, calling the...