Why Beer and Restaurants Can Still Cause Trademark Trouble


May 5, 2025

Hello Reader,

In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit reminded everyone that even if your product seems far removed from a restaurant, a similar name could still cause trademark problems.

The case? A brewery tried to register the mark CHICKEN SCRATCH for beer. But they were blocked by a restaurant that already had a trademark registration for the same name—CHICKEN SCRATCH—for restaurant services.

The Trademark Office refused registration, and the Federal Circuit backed them up.

Here’s What Happened:

🔸 Same mark. Different goods. One was for beer, the other for restaurant services. That doesn’t sound confusing, right?

🔸 But courts want “something more” when marks are identical. The Board found that beer and restaurant services are related enough—if there’s enough overlap in the marketplace.

In this case, the evidence showed:

  • 21 trademark registrations for both beer and restaurant services
  • 18 real-world restaurants that served their own beer under the same brand
  • 9 articles and a book about brewpubs as a recognized category of business

That was enough to prove a connection in the minds of consumers.

The Applicant Tried to Fight Back

The brewery argued that CHICKEN SCRATCH, in their case, meant chicken feed—a clever play on the beer’s grain ingredients. The restaurant, on the other hand, supposedly used it to mean “chicken made from scratch.”

But the court didn’t buy it. They said there was no real evidence showing that beer buyers actually saw “CHICKEN SCRATCH” as a reference to feed.

So, the Board concluded—and the court affirmed—that there was a likelihood of confusion.

Takeaway Tips:

Don’t ignore other industries – Even if you’re not a restaurant, your brand might bump into one.

“Something more” matters – When identical marks are used on goods and services that don’t normally go together, the USPTO will look for real-world overlap—registrations, websites, articles, etc.

Put yourself in the consumer’s shoes – Would they think the beer and restaurant came from the same company?

Be careful with clever – Just because you know what your mark means doesn’t mean the customer will—and the court won’t guess for you.

If you’re launching a beverage, a food product, or a brand that overlaps with the hospitality world—even slightly—it’s critical to clear the name carefully. The restaurant world is packed with trademarks, and the line between beer and branding can be thinner than you think.

Keep Your Brand Safe and Protected,

J.J. Lee and the Trademark Lawyer Law Firm Team!

P.S. If you're planning to serve your own beer, launch a pop-up, or collaborate with a local chef, let's make sure your trademark won’t get tapped out before you pour the first pint.

J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney

Learn something new every Thursday! Join over 4,000 entrepreneurs and business owners for weekly Trademark tips, tricks, and news.

Read more from J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney
A cheese knife rests on a wooden table.

May 19, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, Here’s a recent reminder from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB): sometimes, the name you pick for your product is just too on the nose to protect. That was the case in In re Jacobs Corporation, where the company tried to register the word BLADE as a trademark for a “hammer sold as an integral component of hammer mill machines.” The USPTO said no—and the TTAB backed them up. Why? Let’s break it down: 🔍 Jacobs argued: Their product is a hammer,...

Cannabis plant growing inside a greenhouse.

May 12, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, The USPTO rolled out a new trademark fee structure in January 2025. On the surface, it looks like a simple pricing adjustment—but if you work with hemp or CBD products, the reality is much more costly. Here’s what changed: 🚨 New Trademark Fee Structure (Effective Jan. 18, 2025): Base Application Fee: $350 per class Custom Descriptions: +$200 per class if you don’t use pre-approved ID Manual language Extra Length Fee: +$200 per 1,000 characters over the...

Ground texture featuring dirt, grass, and debris.

April 28, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, Most brand owners know they can’t use misleading trademarks. But did you know a trademark can be refused just for sounding misleading—even if it’s technically true? That’s exactly what happened in the recent case of In re Twisted X, Inc., where the USPTO refused to register the mark ECOTWEED for “footwear made of a tweed-like material.” What’s the issue? The Trademark Office said the mark ECOTWEED was deceptive under Section 2(a) of the Trademark Act....