Why Beer and Restaurants Can Still Cause Trademark Trouble


May 5, 2025

Hello Reader,

In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit reminded everyone that even if your product seems far removed from a restaurant, a similar name could still cause trademark problems.

The case? A brewery tried to register the mark CHICKEN SCRATCH for beer. But they were blocked by a restaurant that already had a trademark registration for the same name—CHICKEN SCRATCH—for restaurant services.

The Trademark Office refused registration, and the Federal Circuit backed them up.

Here’s What Happened:

🔸 Same mark. Different goods. One was for beer, the other for restaurant services. That doesn’t sound confusing, right?

🔸 But courts want “something more” when marks are identical. The Board found that beer and restaurant services are related enough—if there’s enough overlap in the marketplace.

In this case, the evidence showed:

  • 21 trademark registrations for both beer and restaurant services
  • 18 real-world restaurants that served their own beer under the same brand
  • 9 articles and a book about brewpubs as a recognized category of business

That was enough to prove a connection in the minds of consumers.

The Applicant Tried to Fight Back

The brewery argued that CHICKEN SCRATCH, in their case, meant chicken feed—a clever play on the beer’s grain ingredients. The restaurant, on the other hand, supposedly used it to mean “chicken made from scratch.”

But the court didn’t buy it. They said there was no real evidence showing that beer buyers actually saw “CHICKEN SCRATCH” as a reference to feed.

So, the Board concluded—and the court affirmed—that there was a likelihood of confusion.

Takeaway Tips:

Don’t ignore other industries – Even if you’re not a restaurant, your brand might bump into one.

“Something more” matters – When identical marks are used on goods and services that don’t normally go together, the USPTO will look for real-world overlap—registrations, websites, articles, etc.

Put yourself in the consumer’s shoes – Would they think the beer and restaurant came from the same company?

Be careful with clever – Just because you know what your mark means doesn’t mean the customer will—and the court won’t guess for you.

If you’re launching a beverage, a food product, or a brand that overlaps with the hospitality world—even slightly—it’s critical to clear the name carefully. The restaurant world is packed with trademarks, and the line between beer and branding can be thinner than you think.

Keep Your Brand Safe and Protected,

J.J. Lee and the Trademark Lawyer Law Firm Team!

P.S. If you're planning to serve your own beer, launch a pop-up, or collaborate with a local chef, let's make sure your trademark won’t get tapped out before you pour the first pint.

J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney

Learn something new every Thursday! Join over 4,000 entrepreneurs and business owners for weekly Trademark tips, tricks, and news.

Read more from J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney
Ground texture featuring dirt, grass, and debris.

April 28, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, Most brand owners know they can’t use misleading trademarks. But did you know a trademark can be refused just for sounding misleading—even if it’s technically true? That’s exactly what happened in the recent case of In re Twisted X, Inc., where the USPTO refused to register the mark ECOTWEED for “footwear made of a tweed-like material.” What’s the issue? The Trademark Office said the mark ECOTWEED was deceptive under Section 2(a) of the Trademark Act....

Person reading a book, captured in black and white.

April 21, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, Here’s another real-world lesson from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) that highlights two common pitfalls brand owners face: 🔁 Choosing a name that’s too close to an existing mark🔁 Using a last name without understanding the trademark limits The case involved Wyse London, a fashion brand that applied to register its name for clothing and retail store services. But the USPTO refused registration on two separate grounds—and the TTAB agreed....

Guitars sit in a rack, awaiting performance.

April 13, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, Gibson Guitars just won a big victory—and it’s a lesson in brand protection you don’t want to miss. After years of legal back-and-forth, a federal jury once again ruled in favor of Gibson in its trademark case against Dean Guitars (owned by Armadillo Enterprises). At stake? The rights to iconic guitar body shapes like the Flying V, Explorer, and SG. Here’s what the jury decided, straight from the court decision: 🎸 Yes – Dean infringed on Gibson’s...