Trademark Trouble Ahead for Hemp Brands: Why the New USPTO Fees Hit Harder


May 12, 2025

Hello Reader,

The USPTO rolled out a new trademark fee structure in January 2025. On the surface, it looks like a simple pricing adjustment—but if you work with hemp or CBD products, the reality is much more costly.

Here’s what changed:

🚨 New Trademark Fee Structure (Effective Jan. 18, 2025):

  • Base Application Fee: $350 per class
  • Custom Descriptions: +$200 per class if you don’t use pre-approved ID Manual language
  • Extra Length Fee: +$200 per 1,000 characters over the limit
  • Missing Info: +$100 per class if your application lacks new required elements

The idea? Pay less for clean, complete, easy-to-process applications.
The problem? Hemp and CBD businesses are locked out of the “easy” path.

Why It Hurts the Hemp Industry

The USPTO’s Trademark ID Manual does not include pre-approved language for products that contain “not more than 0.3% delta-9 THC”—which is the legal threshold under federal law.

So what happens?
✅ You follow the USPTO’s own guidance and include legally compliant wording.
❌ You’re forced to use custom descriptions—triggering $200 per class in extra fees.

Have three classes? That’s $600 more, just to do it right.

Worse still: if you try to avoid saying “hemp” or “CBD” in your application to keep it simple, you could trigger Office Actions and even refusals later on. You pay now—or you pay later.

The Legal Catch-22

The USPTO says you have to use legally precise language.
But then they penalize you for using it.

Applicants have even asked the USPTO to update the ID Manual to include federally compliant terms. The USPTO’s response? They won’t add terms that “require further inquiry”—meaning you can expect higher fees and stricter scrutiny, even if your product is legal.

What You Can Do

Be strategic – If your application includes hemp or CBD goods, expect a higher cost and plan accordingly.
Consider filing for related goods/services – Apparel, events, education, or accessories may offer cleaner paths to registration.
Stay informed – Don’t let confusion or frustration keep you from protecting your brand.

Many hemp businesses are choosing to fight back—filing anyway, responding to refusals, and advocating for fair treatment. Others are relying on state registrations or common law rights as stopgaps. Either way, the message is clear: compliant hemp brands deserve a seat at the table.

Keep Your Brand Safe and Protected,

J.J. Lee and the Trademark Lawyer Law Firm Team!

P.S. If your trademark mentions hemp or CBD, you will run into extra scrutiny. But you don’t have to face it alone. Let’s map out a smart, cost-effective strategy to protect your brand and stay compliant.

J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney

Learn something new every Thursday! Join over 4,000 entrepreneurs and business owners for weekly Trademark tips, tricks, and news.

Read more from J.J. Lee, Trademark Attorney
Two bright cosmic objects are connected in darkness.

June 30, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, In May 2025, the Federal Circuit upheld the USPTO’s refusal to register the mark US SPACE FORCE—but not for the reason most people expect. The issue wasn’t likelihood of confusion. It was something else: false suggestion of a connection. This refusal falls under Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, which bars registration of any mark that falsely suggests a link with: A person (living or dead) An institution A belief or A national symbol In this case, the...

a black and white photo of the supreme court

June 23, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, A recent case before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) highlights a hard truth: you can lose a trademark dispute not because your argument is wrong—but because your paperwork is incomplete. In Superior Brands v. Retrobrands America, Superior tried to cancel a Supplemental Register trademark (KINNEY SHOES) based on a likelihood of confusion with their own intent-to-use application for a similar mark. Their argument? Their application was filed...

Someone is looking at a map of the united states.

June 16, 2025 TMtelegram Hello Reader, Think your trademark is safe because another business with a similar name is far away? Think again. Recent cases confirm that geographical distance no longer guarantees protection from trademark infringement claims. With online commerce bridging physical gaps, consumers can easily be confused—even across great distances. Always do a thorough nationwide trademark search before you settle on a brand name. And remember, federal registration of your...